“Good Country people” and “Where are you going, Where have you been?” Essay

There are numerous similitudes between the short stories â€Å"Good Country People† and â€Å"Where are you going, Where have you been?†, most remarkably their characters. The two stories contain a female hero, and a male adversary, whose showdowns begin moderately ordinary, and progress to an ever increasing number of dreamlike and contorted endings. Their primary characters, Hulga and Connie, are amazingly comparative, but then unusually extraordinary, one a multi year old wishing to be more established and delightful, the other a harsh multi year old, wishing to be more youthful and terrible. These accounts tell the stories of receptive young ladies who are enticed by the pleasures of bizarre men, just to demonstrate to themselves at long last how guileless they truly are. In â€Å"Where are you going, Where have you been?†, Connie begins as most adolescent young ladies apparently would †she needs to be additionally brave, to seem more established, to encounter a greater amount of the world. She slips from infantile interests, to the young or grown-up world, to drink and kiss young men as opposed to look for school garments, to see motion pictures in a hot vehicle rather than in a theater. She talks of being delightful as though it were her lone acceptable effortlessness †magnificence, to her, is a definitive objective. She needs to be more established, and progressively lovely, and this is her defeat. Her stupidity, and her naivety is the thing that interests to Arnold Friend in any case. Arnold Friend, a more bizarre, offers to her at an opportune time in the story. He is more established, all the more impressive, and more astute. She is scared, obviously, however interested, and it is her longing for the grown-up world, and the grown-up life, that, at long last, causes her destruction. She is suckered in by the persuading conman who utilizes his words to interest her shortcomings. She is fooled into being what Arnold needs her to be by his smooth words and his faã §ade of certainty. She’s played with, played for the naã ¯ve fool she is, who is unreasonably youthful for the world she needs to be a piece of. Just at the finish of the story does she start to acknowledge what she has gotten herself into. She gives her real nature once she is faced. In â€Å"Good Country People†, Joy is a moderately ordinary young lady with some not very typical issues. For a certain something, her leg got brushed off when she was more youthful in a strange chasing mishap. This physical change made her totally reluctant, and basically demolished her life. She could noâ longer be cheerful acting naturally, on the grounds that she considers herself to be genuine offensiveness now. Along these lines, she feels compelled to make herself what she thinks she is. She loathes magnificence now, and significantly alters her to appear to be revolting. She’s been to school, yet still acts puerile. She’s attempting to be youthful, and monstrous. What's more, Manley Pointer sees this nature of her, and exploits her. Regardless of how terrible she attempts to be, he despite everything attempts to (or possibly claims to) like her for what her identity is. Hulga is, paying little mind to her appalling effort, incredibly complimented, and le ts her watchman down long enough for Manley to pull off her glasses, her leg, and all the more critically, her poise. She is additionally stabbed in the back dependent on her own uncertainties. She also is a survivor of a conman who sees that things aren’t consistently what they appear. Connie and Hulga are fundamentally the same as, as characters, but then altogether different no different. The two of them have their uncertainties, and they are both effortlessly gone after by conmen and smooth talkers, yet their instabilities are in completely various domains. The two of them need what different has, and because of this, they are continually attempting to be another person, not themselves, and this is the thing that makes them so natural to assault. They don’t know who they truly are, and they think they need to be something different. This naivety is their ruin †they claim to be something different, join a gathering they shouldn’t be in, and they are enticed by the men in these gatherings. Be that as it may, when the tables turn, and their men aren’t what they have all the earmarks of being, Connie and Hulga return totally, from generally sure fakes to whining young ladies, powerless and miserable, in their phony lives. These two ladies are apparently honest, irregular spectators picked by more established more brilliant conmen. Be that as it may, one could undoubtedly consider them answerable for their own destinies. Not that the casualty in a wrongdoing is at fault, be that as it may, truly, in the event that you leave your vehicle entryway open, with the keys inside, and the engine running, while you go inside a store for a couple of hours, by what means can you appear to be stunned when it gets taken? These two ladies, regardless of whether they in all honesty, are waving several banners at these conmen †â€Å"Please target me!†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ â€Å"Take my leg!†Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ By straightforwardly parading their instabilities and by permitting themselves to be enchanted to the point of trusting the conmen, they are, on the off chance that not completely, at that point in any event in part liable for their own destinies. They came to theirâ own resolutions, and they got what they merited. Connie and Hulga are a similar individual, basically †a lady with various issues wishes to be something that they are not, and smarter and smoother conmen see this, and exploit them. At long last, they are demonstrated to be the fakes that they truly are, and are left progressively powerless, and increasingly open, than they were before they attempted to invade the world in which they didn’t have a place. In the event that there were a mutual good to these accounts, and there is without a doubt not a conspicuous one, they’d both be some place along the lines of â€Å"Be content with what you have, on the grounds that you probably won't have a place anyplace else†, and in the instances of Connie and Hulga, this ethical fits consummately. They are a similar individual with various conditions, and they are so effectively went after by the savvier smoother conman. As these accounts outrightly state, be content with what you have. You probably won't fit anyplace else, and one day, somebody may very well challenge you on your false front, to tragic results.